4 ms·
Still? They really don't overcharge. The storage they sell is much, much, much faster than what everyone compares it to at lower prices.
by Schiendelman 1y ago
Still? They really don't overcharge. The storage they sell is much, much, much faster than what everyone compares it to at lower prices.
- tempaccount420 1y agoYou can get Mac Studio 3rd party "SSDs" for less than half the price Apple charges for the same storage, with the same performance, they even use the same flash chips!
- dzhiurgis 1y agoI wouldn’t mind some cheap slow storage. SD card / usb-c mini plugs aren’t really great option.
- Panzer04 1y agoEvidence?
- kokada 1y agoWhere are you getting this information? Curious because I can't find any evidence that Apple has "much, much, much faster" storage. If anything, Apple storage looks mediocre at best. For example: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/m4-mbp-ssd-speeds.2442283/ https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/m4-mbp-ssd-speeds.24422.... Compare with: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/crucial-t710-2tb-ssd-review/2 https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/crucial-t710.... While it is not an Apple to Oranges comparison, T710 seems 80% faster for writing big files, and for $279.99 - $299.99 for 2TB this is still much cheaper than whatever Apple is offering. If you have a better reference (specially if there is something that is cross platform), I would be interested.