2 ms·
Did it sound like an explicit decision from jj or just being inherited from Git?
by 1718627440 1y ago
Did it sound like an explicit decision from jj or just being inherited from Git?
- steveklabnik 1y agoThe jj git backend happens to update only one of the two timestamps. There's not a lot of talk about the author date on the jj issue tracker. I did not dig into the history of the code, so I can't say if it was an explicit design decision or just how it was implemented. Since there hasn't been a lot of demand to change anything here, I didn't see any active discussion about the choice. EDIT: oh I see martin has said 'we just followed git' here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45599741 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45599741