3 ms·

While that is a somewhat rational viewpoint, I am old-fashioned enough to consider the philosophy that right and wrong don't matter, only profits, to be unhealt

While that is a somewhat rational viewpoint, I am old-fashioned enough to consider the philosophy that right and wrong don't matter, only profits, to be unhealthy.

CamperBob2 14y ago
It would be rational if Apple could somehow be certain that they have duly licensed all applicable patents for the technology in all of their products. So, no... it's about as rational as stripping naked and running through Times Square with a vuvuzela, daring the cops to come after you.
- AllenKids 14y ago
  It is rational cause Apple can be sure that it does not willfully infringe on others patents and risks regarding those patents mines unavoidable can be managed through ad hoc negotiation and lawyers, lots of lawyers. Given such a high profile case just resulted in a puny $1B amount, with its over $100B war chest, Apple can take a few dozens of these lawsuits easily. Let's see who's willing to go against Apple and comes out ahead.
AllenKids 14y ago
Apple is not a company only focus on profits, far from it, regardless what every other HNer is trying to paint them to be. Philosophically what is right and wrong, and to whom? That's another question. Of course using metaphysics to muddling the water is not my intention, but even using the common sense definition of "right and wrong" I still do not see what Apple does here as "evil" or "unhealthy". It is self serving to be sure, but I'm not convinced that the market is necessarily harmed in the process. There is and will be fierce competition in the mobile arena for many years to come unlike the portable music player market. Anyone is willing to take a bet against my observation? Apple is using the system to its own advantage, just as Google, if wielding patent bat is fundamentally wrong, then Google the white knight in shinning armor is a bigger cunt for its hypocrisy.
- mcantelon 14y ago
  Not sure how Google can be seen as hypocrites. They avoided the realm of patent warfare until it was clearly unavoidable.
  - AllenKids 14y ago
    They avoid the realm of patent warfare until they purchase relevant patents.
    - mcantelon 14y ago
      Yes, when it became clear Apple was going to continue to rely on patent warfare as a business strategy, they secured patents.
      - AllenKids 14y ago
        So you are saying that sometimes swinging the patent stick can be right?
        mcantelon 14y ago
        If someone's swinging it at you, then it's understandable as a method of self defense.
        AllenKids 14y ago
        But there are many ways of inflict damages, patent lawsuit is just one of them. Why is this weapon special? If it is inherently evil, then using it under any condition should be condemned. If it is not, then again why treat it like it's special?
        mcantelon 14y ago
        >If it is inherently evil, then using it under any condition should be condemned. Perhaps the legal system is misguided to consider violence in self defense different from unprovoked violence?

While that is a somewhat rational viewpoint, I am old-fashioned enough to consider the philosophy that right and wrong don't matter, only profits, to be unhealthy.

CamperBob2 14y ago

It would be rational if Apple could somehow be certain that they have duly licensed all applicable patents for the technology in all of their products. So, no... it's about as rational as stripping naked and running through Times Square with a vuvuzela, daring the cops to come after you.

AllenKids 14y ago
It is rational cause Apple can be sure that it does not willfully infringe on others patents and risks regarding those patents mines unavoidable can be managed through ad hoc negotiation and lawyers, lots of lawyers. Given such a high profile case just resulted in a puny $1B amount, with its over $100B war chest, Apple can take a few dozens of these lawsuits easily. Let's see who's willing to go against Apple and comes out ahead.

AllenKids 14y ago

Apple is not a company only focus on profits, far from it, regardless what every other HNer is trying to paint them to be. Philosophically what is right and wrong, and to whom? That's another question. Of course using metaphysics to muddling the water is not my intention, but even using the common sense definition of "right and wrong" I still do not see what Apple does here as "evil" or "unhealthy". It is self serving to be sure, but I'm not convinced that the market is necessarily harmed in the process. There is and will be fierce competition in the mobile arena for many years to come unlike the portable music player market. Anyone is willing to take a bet against my observation? Apple is using the system to its own advantage, just as Google, if wielding patent bat is fundamentally wrong, then Google the white knight in shinning armor is a bigger cunt for its hypocrisy.

mcantelon 14y ago
Not sure how Google can be seen as hypocrites. They avoided the realm of patent warfare until it was clearly unavoidable.
- AllenKids 14y ago
  They avoid the realm of patent warfare until they purchase relevant patents.
  - mcantelon 14y ago
    Yes, when it became clear Apple was going to continue to rely on patent warfare as a business strategy, they secured patents.
    - AllenKids 14y ago
      So you are saying that sometimes swinging the patent stick can be right?
      - mcantelon 14y ago
        If someone's swinging it at you, then it's understandable as a method of self defense.
        AllenKids 14y ago
        But there are many ways of inflict damages, patent lawsuit is just one of them. Why is this weapon special? If it is inherently evil, then using it under any condition should be condemned. If it is not, then again why treat it like it's special?
        mcantelon 14y ago
        >If it is inherently evil, then using it under any condition should be condemned. Perhaps the legal system is misguided to consider violence in self defense different from unprovoked violence?