Well, you can map over options/maybes. For-loop style iteration over an option does seem a little strange IMO, first, because syntactically it looks like overki

Well, you can map over options/maybes. For-loop style iteration over an option does seem a little strange IMO, first, because syntactically it looks like overkill, and second (and more importantly), because map evals to a value, while `for` does not. But I suppose in C++, given the centrality of looping constructs, this is what you would do to accommodate option.