4 ms·

There's no such thing as "Rust evangelists targeting existing projects" as some sort of broad strategy. What you're observing is that some people like to write

There's no such thing as "Rust evangelists targeting existing projects" as some sort of broad strategy. What you're observing is that some people like to write programs in Rust, and so they choose to write new code in Rust. For some people, writing versions of software they understand already is a good way to learn a language, for some, it's that they don't like some aspect of the existing software and want to make something similar, but different. That is, nobody perceives, say, "the silver searcher" as being some sort of nefarious plot to re-write grep, but they did with ripgrep, even though that's not what it is trying to do. There are a few projects that are deliberately doing a re-write for reasons they consider important, but they're not "just because it's in Rust," they're things like "openssl has had memory safety issues, we should use tools that eliminate those" or "sudo is very important and has grown a lot of features and has had memory safety issues, we should consider cutting some scope and using tools that help eliminate the memory safety issues." But those number of projects are very small. Heck, even things like uutils were originally "I just want to learn Rust" projects and not some sort of "we must re-write the world in Rust."

LexiMax 1y ago
> That is, nobody perceives, say, "the silver searcher" as being some sort of nefarious plot to re-write grep, but they did with ripgrep, even though that's not what it is trying to do. I have a suspicion as to why this perception exists in the C++ crowd. I don't think it's because of evangelists. C++ was that evangelized language in the early 90's, but after a period in the sun it then survived the evangelism of Java, Python, Go, and others, despite losing ground to them in general purpose tasks. And that's because all of those other languages, while being much safer than C++, came at the cost of performance or the overhead of a runtime. There was really no other language that had the expressiveness of C++ while allowing the developer to get down to the bare metal if they needed speed. The existence and growing popularity of Rust changes that calculus, and I imagine that makes certain developers who might have a lot of investment in the C++ ecosystem defensive, causing them to overreact to any perceived slight in a way that other languages simply don't provoke.
throwawaymaths 1y ago
"Broad strategy" is your words, not gp's. you are fighting a strawman. gp is just arguing that this is happening, and it's annoying.

LexiMax 1y ago

> That is, nobody perceives, say, "the silver searcher" as being some sort of nefarious plot to re-write grep, but they did with ripgrep, even though that's not what it is trying to do. I have a suspicion as to why this perception exists in the C++ crowd. I don't think it's because of evangelists. C++ was that evangelized language in the early 90's, but after a period in the sun it then survived the evangelism of Java, Python, Go, and others, despite losing ground to them in general purpose tasks. And that's because all of those other languages, while being much safer than C++, came at the cost of performance or the overhead of a runtime. There was really no other language that had the expressiveness of C++ while allowing the developer to get down to the bare metal if they needed speed. The existence and growing popularity of Rust changes that calculus, and I imagine that makes certain developers who might have a lot of investment in the C++ ecosystem defensive, causing them to overreact to any perceived slight in a way that other languages simply don't provoke.

throwawaymaths 1y ago

"Broad strategy" is your words, not gp's. you are fighting a strawman. gp is just arguing that this is happening, and it's annoying.