3 ms·
> Human cognition was basically bruteforced by evolution You center cognition/intelligence on humans as if it was the pinacle of it, rather than include the wh
by Juliate 1y ago
> Human cognition was basically bruteforced by evolution
You center cognition/intelligence on humans as if it was the pinacle of it, rather than include the whole lot of other species (that may have totally different, or adjacent cognition models). Why? How so?
> As soon as profit can be made by transfering decision power into an AIs hand
There's an ironic, deadly, Frankensteinesque delusion in this very premise.
- soiltype 1y ago> You center cognition/intelligence on humans as if it was the pinacle of it, rather than include the whole lot of other species (that may have totally different, or adjacent cognition models). Why does that matter to their argument? Truly, the variety of intelligences on earth now only increases the likelihood of AGI being possible, as we have many pathways that don't follow the human model.
- myrmidon 1y ago> You center cognition/intelligence on humans as if it was the pinacle of it That's not my viewpoint, from elsewhere in the thread: Cognition is (to me) not the most impressive and out-of-reach evolutionary achievement: That would be how our (and animals) bodies are self-assembling, self-repairing and self-replicating, with an impressive array of sensors and actors in a highly integrated package. I honestly believe our current technology is much closer to emulating a human brain than it is to building a (non-intelligent) cat.