3 ms·
> If they could release this for around the price of a 5090 This is not targeted at consumers. It’s competing with nVidia’s high RAM workstation cards. Think $
by Aurornis 1y ago
> If they could release this for around the price of a 5090
This is not targeted at consumers. It’s competing with nVidia’s high RAM workstation cards. Think $10K price range, not $1-2K.
The 160GB of LPDDR5X chips alone is expensive enough that they couldn’t release this at the $2K price point unless they felt like giving it away (which they don’t)
- minraws 1y agoIt's probably spark dgx competition. So around 3-5k would be ideally it. Any higher and its not really a disruption
- Sweepi 1y agoIn the back of my head floats $200 - $300 for the 64 GiB GDDR7 that you get for spending 7k-10k on an ADA 6000 96 GiB instead of 2k for a 5090 32 GiB. Am I off? Is LPDDR5X more expensive?
- Sweepi 1y agoNote for myself: each 3 GiB GDDR7 IC costs $10-$15, x32 sums up to $320-$480, https://www.techpowerup.com/337853/samsung-3-gb-gddr7-chips-sold-in-chinese-retail-attracts-memory-modders https://www.techpowerup.com/337853/samsung-3-gb-gddr7-chips-...
- nullsmack 1y agoThey better watch the price because you can get a 128GB AMD Strix Halo mini pc for ~1700-2000 today, and those will be even cheaper a year from now. If they're trying to be competitive then it really needs to be more in that ballpark than the massively overpriced Nvidia range.
- conradev 1y agoThe GDDR7 found next to most Blackwell chips is more expensive than the LPDDR5X next to this or an M-series/Strix Halo chip.