4 ms·
Lowest tier comes with 16 gb of memory, same memory size with lowest M. air, why Apple?
by Printerisreal 1y ago
Lowest tier comes with 16 gb of memory, same memory size with lowest M. air, why Apple?
- znkr 1y agoSearch for memory wall. Moore’s law died a decade ago for DRAM
- simonw 1y agoIt looks like the highest tier is 32GB, which really surprised me. I guess we'll have to wait for the M5 Pro / M5 Max for more memory than that. Bad news for anyone who buys the M5 MacBook Pro as an "AI" machine and finds it can't fit any of the more interesting LLMs!
- ortusdux 1y agoThey are running out of ways to differentiate their products.
- outside1234 1y agoWait what!?!? My MacBook M1 has 64GB of memory for crying out loud.
- xuki 1y agoIt has always been this way. Base M1's max RAM was 16GB, M2/M3's was 24GB, M4's was 32GB.
- Printerisreal 1y agoBase m1 was like 4-5 years ago. did we have that much ram with oldest macs too, 30 years ago? 4-5 years at same base RAM is incredibly cheap behaviour from Apple. Some phones are literally close to that RAM now.
- masklinn 1y agoBase M1 had 8GB RAM base and 16 max. Where are you getting “same base ram”?
- Printerisreal 1y ago%100 ram growth in 5 years still very slow and cheap.
- flemhans 1y agoI think 8GB was also what we had in ... 2012? Or am I wrong. Memory has been going so slow.
- wltr 1y agoFirst Retina MacBook Pros 13" were with 8 GB base memory. That was either 2013 or even 2012, so, yeah.
- tracker1 1y agoYou could (unsupported) run 16gb ram on 2010 rMBP models, back before it was soldered on. Worked great, not to mention swapping the spinning drive for an SSD. At this point, I get the soldered on ram, for better or worse... I do wish at least storage was more approachable.
- polshaw 1y agoIndeed. RAM is the tool of planned obselecence (and profiteering for that matter).
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- sixothree 1y agoAnd a "pro" computer that comes with half a tb of storage by default with a $200 premium for another 0.5 tb of storage. Oof. Just gross. I know people complain at every release. But I look at the three choices presented and they are all disappointing to me. It's a huge turnoff to see the only initial differentiator presented to be a choice between "measly" amounts of RAM and storage to "barely acceptable" amounts. To get even close to the specs on my Surface Pro I'd have to hit the configurator and spend at least $1000. Even more to hit the config of my work issued HP notebook.
- sings_lullabies 1y ago[dead]
- czbond 1y agoThe Pro sales page says their RAM is unified, which is more efficient than traditional. Anyone have a concept by how much more efficient unified RAM performs vs RAM? Their sales copy for reference: "M-series chips include unified memory, which is more efficient than traditional RAM. This single pool of high-performance memory allows apps to efficiently share data between the CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine.... This means you can do more with unified memory than you could with the same amount of traditional RAM."
- _joel 1y agoIt's unified on the Air too though?
- hasperdi 1y agoyes, all Mx processors have unified ram
- masklinn 1y agoRAM has always been unified on every M series CPU.
- thefz 1y agoIt just means it's shared between GPU and CPU. Has its advantages in specific workloads, but dedicated super fast GPU RAM usually is better. Everything else in this statement in marketing bullshit and Apple trying to look like they invented the wheel and discovered fire.
- tracker1 1y agoThe fact that it's unified just means it's shared between CPU/GPU usage which can be a good thing. A lot of the performance comes from more channels and a more stable distance from the CPU itself... Getting really fast performance from RAM is more difficult with a detachable interface in the middle, and longer traces. Still not the fastest ram, that they use for dedicated GPUs, but faster than most x86 options.
- masklinn 1y agoBecause the MacBook “pro” with a base (not pro or max) M is and has always been an air with better cooling.
- justonceokay 1y agoFor perspective I have a 12 year old MacBook with 8 gigs of ram and it’s still perfectly usable for all the things I do on it. If you need more RAM because you are video encoding, compiling, or gaming (why!?) then you aren’t a basic consumer. I’m not trying into be a fanboy and maybe it’s a little bit “cope”, but apple has always put as much RAM as is necessary for the computer to work—and not a lot more—in their base models.
- michaelt 1y agoThe $1599 M5 Macbook Pro: Good enough for a guy who thinks a 12-year-old MacBook with 8 gigs of ram is "still perfectly usable" :)
- justonceokay 1y agoI know it’s silly, but I think I represent over 90% of apples customers in that way. I just need something that reads emails and shows me porn.
- leakycap 1y ago> I know it’s silly, but I think I represent over 90% of apples customers in that way You're not silly, you're just able to see reality. Apple knows who is buying the bulk of their computers, and it isn't power users ... most people buying computers don't have a clue what RAM is even used for. I'd hit beachballs, but macOS balances 8GB of RAM fine even with Tahoe for regular users
- eitally 1y agoThat 90% are perfect candidates for the even cheaper Macbook Air lineup.
- dvfjsdhgfv 1y agoWell, they could continue the 8gb joke so let's appreciate the fact that they finally switched to 16gb base models (and similarly stopped the 128GB SSD madness, these models were outdated when bought).