3 ms·
> Google Drive would be good enough It gets deleted. TOS violation. > (if you can access Meta, you can access Google Drive) Not necessarily. No capable perso
by jasonlotito 1y ago
> Google Drive would be good enough
It gets deleted. TOS violation.
> (if you can access Meta, you can access Google Drive)
Not necessarily. No capable person that understands tech at all would think this.
> or any other cloud storage where you maintain ownership of your data.
If you don't own the infrastructure, do you really own it? And none of these are resilient to takedown requests, or other means of removal.
> Internet Archive allows takedown requests from content owners,
That's not what happened here. He was the content owner. Also, you pretend like other groups don't also do that.
> You can give people anywhere in the world the credentials to access it:
Like IG did?
None of your solutions meet my criteria in the slightest.
- terminalshort 1y agoThe TOS for Google Drive is nothing like social media. You maintain ownership and do not grant a license to use. Meta's TOS grants them a license to use and delete whenever they want. Instagram isn't a storage product in any sense of the word and Google Drive is. Whatever the details about ownership of the photos are, Internet Archive coppied them from Meta's domain, so Meta can order the takedown. Try knowing something about what you are talking about.