3 ms·
I'm currently satisfied with Claude Code, but this article seems to sing the praises of Codex. I am dubious Whether it's actually superior or it's 'organic mark
by N_Lens 1y ago
I'm currently satisfied with Claude Code, but this article seems to sing the praises of Codex. I am dubious Whether it's actually superior or it's 'organic marketing' by OAI (Given that they undoubtedly do this, and other shady practices).
I'll give codex a try later to compare.
- esafak 1y agoCodex is about as capable as Sonnet, but slower. One advantage is that it more readily pushes back against requests, like the article noted.
- lysecret 1y agoThis is very funny to me I rarely found this pushback to be useful and mostly very annoying. Claude code has the opposite problem sometimes though. To some extend this ends up being a pure preference of character. You want ur ai coder to be disagreeable or agreeable. Maybe this is a good way to differentiate.
- esafak 1y agoIf it does not push back, how will you know you have a bad idea; when you face the consequences?
- joshribakoff 1y agoBy not relying on AI to think for you.
- dinkleberg 1y agoI’ve found codex to be a much more thorough code reviewer. Recently I’ve been using Claude for code gen and codex for review. I keep trying to use Gemini as it is so fast, but it is far inferior in every other way in my experience.