3 ms·
That’s a very poetic description. Mine is simpler. It’s a generator. You train it to give it the parameters (weights) of the formula thag generate stuff (the fo
by skydhash 1y ago
That’s a very poetic description. Mine is simpler. It’s a generator. You train it to give it the parameters (weights) of the formula thag generate stuff (the formula is known). Then you give it some input data, and it will gives you an output.
Both the weights and the formula is known. But the weight are meaningless in a human fashion. This is unlike traditional software where everything from encoding (the meaning of the bits) to how the state machine (the cpu) was codified by humans.
The only ways to fix it (somewhat) is to come up with better training data (hopeless), a better formula, or tacking something on top to smooth the worst errors (kinda hopeless).
- 1718627440 1y ago> The only ways to fix it The correct way to fix it would be to build a decompiler to normal code, that would explain what it does, but this is akin to building the everything machine.