5 ms·

You've got a point on RTO. Because it's a group behaviour, if you believe it will have positive effects, mandating it could be a way of jumpstarting the group d

You've got a point on RTO. Because it's a group behaviour, if you believe it will have positive effects, mandating it could be a way of jumpstarting the group dynamic. With LLMs, I'm not so sure. Seems more like an individual activity to me. Are some people resistant to new tools, sure. But a good tool does tend to diffuse naturally. I think LLMs are diffusing naturally too, but maybe not as fast as the AI-boosters would like. The mistake these managers are making is assuming it's a good tool for work that they're not qualified to assess.

rdtsc 1y ago
> You've got a point on RTO. Because it's a group behaviour, if you believe it will have positive effects, mandating it could be a way of jumpstarting the group dynamic. Fair point! It was just the first recent example of "it's obviously better but we'll force you to do it" I could think of. In case of RTO I think it should have been left to individual small team. If one is so clearly it would have been clear in a few years time which teams work better and which didn't and how it depended on them being in the same office.