Rust libraries also impose an - in my opinion - unacceptable burden to the open source ecosystem: https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/issues.h

Rust libraries also impose an - in my opinion - unacceptable burden to the open source ecosystem: https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/issues.html#limitations-in-security-support https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/issues.... This makes me less safe rather than more. Note that there is a substantial double standard here, we could never in the name of safety impose this level of burden from C tooling side because maintainers would rightfully be very upset (even toggling a warning in the default set causes discussions). For the same reason it should be unacceptable to use Rust before this is fixed, but somehow the memory safety absolutists convinced many people that this is more important than everything else. (I also think memory safety is important, but I can't help but thinking that pushing for Rust is more harmful to me than good. )