4 ms·
The forcing argument has merit, it should not be forced, in fact they should say very little about how we do our work. But the "rubber-stamp" framing is wrong,
by visarga 1y ago
The forcing argument has merit, it should not be forced, in fact they should say very little about how we do our work.
But the "rubber-stamp" framing is wrong, if it were true then you would not be needed at all. It's actually harder to use gen AI than to code manually. Gen AI has a rapid pace and overwhelming quantity of code you need to ensure is not broken in non-obvious ways. You need to layer constraints, tests, feedback systems for self repair and handle memories across contexts.
I recently vibe coded 100K LOC across dozens of apps, I feel the rush of power in coding agents but also the danger. At any moment they could hallucinate, misunderstand or use a different premise than you did. Going past 1000 LOC requires sustained focus, it will quickly unravel into a mess otherwise.
- therein 1y agoIt is not harder if you don't care about or even understand what could go wrong. It is harder if you care and want to be as confident of this code as if it is your own hand-written code. Feels like you are assuming everyone has your diligence and the diligence that exists in the industry isn't already rapidly decaying due to what's happening.
- bagacrap 1y agoFeels like he's overestimating his own diligence. After all a couple weeks is not enough time to discover all the shortcomings of this output.