4 ms·
I think your post is fundamentally wrong. See, you are comparing AI responses with the written code, which may not be the fair comparison. I see it as, better y
by virajk_31 1y ago
I think your post is fundamentally wrong. See, you are comparing AI responses with the written code, which may not be the fair comparison. I see it as, better you could compare code generated by AI vs the code written by an engineer.
- schoen 1y agoThe original author seems to view the AI application as itself a software application which has desired or undesired, and predictable or unpredictable, behaviors. That doesn't seem like an invalid thing to talk about merely because there are other software-related conversations we can have about AIs (or other code-quality-related conversations).
- emoII 1y agoAI responses and code generated by AI are literally the same thing
- rbits 1y agoI'm confused by this comment. That's a completely different discussion.
- beyarkay 1y agoI think you misunderstood my post? I'm comparing AI as a system vs written code as a system. Both systems can have flaws, but the way in which they fail is different. The danger comes when non-technical people try to apply intuitions about software failures to AI, because those intuitions are false when applied to AI.