3 ms·
> he said he was concerned the law could “unintentionally” impose a total ban on the use of AI chatbots by minors. To a lot of people here that's a feature. I
by delichon 1y ago
> he said he was concerned the law could “unintentionally” impose a total ban on the use of AI chatbots by minors.
To a lot of people here that's a feature. I don't think so. It would put California minors at a huge economic disadvantage to kids in other places. One state can't put AI back in the box. I think California has the right to run that experiment, but Newsom made a wise choice in stopping it.
- bigyabai 1y ago> It would put California minors at a huge economic disadvantage to kids in other places. This feels like conjecture. Can't we just as easily reason that kids with access to AI become complacent and reliant on non-authoritative sources? I think we need a proper A/B test before we conclude these things for certain.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- more_corn 1y agoFrom my speaking to teachers banning children from AI would result in a massive gain for them. Kids are phoning it in and having ai do all their thinking. They’re not learning to think and write and communicate.
- Nasrudith 1y agoHave you heard the maxim that unenforceable laws only breed contempt for the law? Do you remember your days as a minor and how well forbidding the fruit worked? This "for the children" law would be widely flouted.