> I'll never doubt the ability of people like yourself to consistently mischaracterize human capabilities Ditto for your mischaracterizations of LLMs. > There

> I'll never doubt the ability of people like yourself to consistently mischaracterize human capabilities Ditto for your mischaracterizations of LLMs. > There are still so many obvious errors (noticeable by just using Claude or ChatGPT to do some non-trivial task) that the average human would simply not make. Firstly, so what? LLMs also do things no human could do. Secondly, they've learned from unimodal data sets which don't have the rich semantic content that humans are exposed to (not to mention born with due to evolution). Questions that cross modal boundaries are expected to be wrong. > If the gap is getting smaller, surely soon it will be zero, right? Quantify "soon".