> doesn't mean that LLMs are somehow human in their flaws. I don't believe anyone is suggesting that LLMs flaws are perfectly 1:1 aligned with human flaws, jus

> doesn't mean that LLMs are somehow human in their flaws. I don't believe anyone is suggesting that LLMs flaws are perfectly 1:1 aligned with human flaws, just that both do have flaws. > If the gap is getting smaller, surely soon it will be zero, right? The gap between y=x^2 and y=-x^2-1 gets closer for a bit, fails to ever become zero, then gets bigger. The difference between any given human (or even all humans) and AI will never be zero: Some future AI that can only do what one or all of us can do, can be trivially glued to any of that other stuff where AI can already do better, like chess and go (and stuff simple computers can do better, like arithmetic).