3 ms·
*I'm going to preface this as a take that is a generally unpopular view whose intent tends to be misunderstood. At what point do we see our culture of envy or
by 1659447091 1y ago
*I'm going to preface this as a take that is a generally unpopular view whose intent tends to be misunderstood.
At what point do we see our culture of envy or cheap "wins" or the replacement/conflation of present, active, and involved role models with the fast-fashion idol worship of celebrities/sport stars or tech-bro/influencer billionaire as helping to wire the brain in a way that rewards fast money thoughts like gambling.
When we grow up modestly and have this glamorous fast money jet-setting lifestyle of people who mostly lucked into right time/place/genetics thrown in our face at 30-60 second intervals every 10+ mins everyday of our lives (worse with social media), it's not the betting that we are not wired to defend against.
If there's a solution to course correct the culture of needing hyper-excessive things & external-validation to feel worthy I dont know what it is -- but if it involved its prohibition I would be against it as being an extension of the problem. There is a correlation between sports events and incidences of domestic violence[0], if we care about sports betting causing violence to others and wish to stop it, then by that logic stopping sports altogether solves even more harm. But cutting the sickly branches of a live oak is not the way to prevent oak wilt from spreading through the community
Betting is benign in itself, but when the belief becomes that $_thing can quickly solve all of life's problems, people get creative in their pursuit of it. Crypto itself benign, but a tool for quick money; large swaths are harmed financially and some physically (not whataboutism, its related root causes). The war on drugs didn't do so well in their protecting of others either. Targeting bets to shield people from misuse will push it back underground where the most "vulnerable" addicts have 3 problems now. (gambling, law, broken limbs) It also inadvertently reinforces the culture that they are not whole in themselves, enabling them to continue to skirt their part in being responsible for their own life and feelings of worthiness.
The top comment* here is, imo, one of the more balanced takes in terms of time to impact and coverage over the calls for hamfisted prohibition type regulations. It also minimizes harm by still treating adults as adults but also by sending the message that the predatory behaviour (e.g., gamified mobile betting, betting adverts on Premier League kits) won't be tolerated.
*"Legislation needs to target the industrialization of the delivery not the act itself." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45581785 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45581785
[0] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087409/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087409/
- eimrine 1y ago> There is a correlation between sports events and incidences of domestic violence What about a correlation between one demagogic law and a hundred ones more? The train principle: allow one unfair action and you will see some more. Crash one window on the street and you will see more. Allow the murderer to murder once with impunity and you will see more. And if you are a state actor - please - get off my family! Domestic violence is not your responsibility.
- 1659447091 1y ago> And if you are a state actor - please - get off my family! Domestic violence is not your responsibility. If you are AI please get off the internet. You not only cherry picked a small factoid but completely took it out of context and missed the boat
- eimrine 1y agoYour comment is 28 lines long on my monitor, my comment is only 6 lines. I understand that I definitely have not reacted to all of the comment. But why not to notice where have I threw the baby out with the bathwater? I can not be AI because my comments are nonconformist and I write the foreign language (English) without checking grammar.