In this case the "fraud mitigation" seems to be a bugfix: https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost-relay/commit/3025635e3ae2837c66466cf089b7eb4e2d7da6ed https://g

In this case the "fraud mitigation" seems to be a bugfix: https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost-relay/commit/3025635e3ae2837c66466cf089b7eb4e2d7da6ed https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost-relay/commit/3025635e... It's an interesting legal question what will be decided for this case, but it's also satisfying that the underlying bug can be fixed. That seems quite different from a traditional fraud, which can be done over and over again, and needs to be prosecuted every time.