This is amusingly simple minded. Does the author not realize that it will just cause big pay cuts for the most highly compensated employees (not necessarily a

This is amusingly simple minded. Does the author not realize that it will just cause big pay cuts for the most highly compensated employees (not necessarily a bad thing). Corporations will cut CEO pay in order to pay lower corporate taxes. Why on earth would they increase pay across the board in order to decrease the highest paid:lowest paid ratio? This is basically an argument for cutting corporate taxes, which I don't entirely disagree with, but if that's what he wants to do he should just argue that on its own merits rather than coming up with a scheme that even brain dead tax accountant could get around.