4 ms·
Coleman won the 'Slants' case at SCOTUS, so he's the real thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matal_v._Tam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matal_v._Tam https:/
by quercusa 1y ago
Coleman won the 'Slants' case at SCOTUS, so he's the real thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matal_v._Tam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matal_v._Tam
https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/legal-publications-ron-coleman/slants-redskins-and-other-disparaging-trademarks/ https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/legal-publications-ron...
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- ycombinatrix 1y agoArguing a case in front of SCOTUS still means something today?
- antonymoose 1y agoAs a layman, I thought that was a bit of a prestige deal. Is it not?
- johaugum 1y agoSome would say it has lately become a bit of a kangaroo court.
- downrightmike 1y agoPut enough money into the right-wing hands and anything is possible
- EasyMark 1y agoIt still is but current SCOTUS of US has lost a lot of credibility in essentially making Presidents 4 to 8 year kings who can't be sued or charged with a crime. There are other things like the newer judges lying while under oath that they weren't joining up to end decisions on civil rights and ending abortion as a basic right.