3 ms·
We wrote about what it means for F-Droid at: https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/google-developer-registration-decree.html https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/goog
by marcprux 1y ago
We wrote about what it means for F-Droid at:
https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/google-developer-registration-decree.html https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/google-developer-registrat...
And it has been discussed in a couple of HN threads:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45409794 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45409794
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45507173 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45507173
- dang 1y agoThanks! Macroexpanded: Google's requirement for developers to be verified threatens app store F-Droid - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45507173 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45507173 - Oct 2025 (152 comments) F-Droid and Google’s developer registration decree - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45409794 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45409794 - Sept 2025 (564 comments)
- shkkmo 1y ago> we cannot “take over” the application identifiers for the open-source apps we distribute, as that would effectively seize exclusive distribution rights to those applications. Since these are open source apps, couldn't f-droid maintain their own fork of each app with a different application identifier? It would give Google the ability to shutdown F-Droid at will by baning their account and thus far more power to control what F-Droid publishes and how it operates. However, it seems like anyone could fork an open source app and use their own account and setup their own unique identifier for their fork. No question this increases Google's power but it doesn't seem like it technically makes it impossible to operate a store like F-Droid.