3 ms·
If you ever want to sell, getting in the limit nothing for the shares might matter, no? There are other things: for example, share based M&A or compensation or
by RandomLensman 1y ago
If you ever want to sell, getting in the limit nothing for the shares might matter, no? There are other things: for example, share based M&A or compensation or other investors with different preferences - no relevance or interaction?
- triceratops 1y ago> If you ever want to sell I already said that buybacks benefit sellers. > share based M&A or compensation All fair points. Share-based M&A can be good for investors. But if the stock price is going up because the company spent money on buybacks, then the company could also just pay cash for M&A and skip the buybacks. Higher compensation is good for employees who get paid stock and for upper management, who are nearly always paid largely in stock. There's an argument that's good for shareholders because of better retention. But if that were the case, why not just pay employees more cash?
- RandomLensman 1y agoAre there many investors that are never sellers (that is different from selling soon-ish)? Paying cash could be quite different than paying in shares for M&A. If owning/using shares makes no difference to cash (whether to employees or in M&A situations), why not do buybacks then if there is no difference between cash and shares anyway?