3 ms·
>~75–80% of S&P 500 gains Dot com bust was 50% of S&P / 80% on Nasdaq... we survived it.. For Nvidia: all it will take is for one smart grad student to find a
by jhallenworld 1y ago
>~75–80% of S&P 500 gains
Dot com bust was 50% of S&P / 80% on Nasdaq... we survived it..
For Nvidia: all it will take is for one smart grad student to find a better training algorithm to destroy 75% of their value.
Why I think a better algorithm is out there:
Total installed GPU Tflops = 4 billion. Tflops of human brain = 1 million
- Yoric 1y ago> For Nvidia: all it will take is for one smart grad student to find a better training algorithm to destroy 75% of their value. I don't think so. We've already seen several generations of better training algorithms, but they all rely on CUDA, hence on NVidia.
- jhallenworld 1y agoFor inference they already face competition: that deal OpenAI announced with AMD .. at a certain point it will be worth broadening away from CUDA.
- cantor_S_drug 1y agoBut the flip side is excess capacity will be used for other fields which are not getting a chance.
- Yoric 1y agoOn the other hand, GPUs die down fairly quickly, so this excess capacity had better prove useful rather quickly.
- adidoit 1y agoIs that true? I was under the impression that one reason NVIDIA is so entrenched is that their GPUs are highly flexible. Versus the ASIC offerings of other specialized players are more focused on transformers remaining the dominant architecture.
- jhallenworld 1y agoMaybe the better algorithm will be able to run on GPUs.
- baq 1y agothe 1 million is debatable, but you can't argue with the power consumption of 20W. that said, if all the current infrastructure could run brain-equivalent models at 20W each, I'd wager we would have much more demand than currently.
- Windchaser 1y agoThere's speed, efficiency, and determinism. Pick 2
- quantumspandex 1y agoComputation on human brain is on a totally different substrate than silicon. It's in memory and highly error prone. It's questionable a mere algorithm would get us there without a fundamental change in computer architecture. (in terms of Intelligence / W)