Why are the authors so aggressive in using scam/fraud/etc terms when discussing the crime, but then spend so little time explaining the defense? This article se

Why are the authors so aggressive in using scam/fraud/etc terms when discussing the crime, but then spend so little time explaining the defense? This article seems wildly one sided and I’m not a fan of how it’s written. It looks like both of the author just do clickbait articles - their last ~10 articles are solely about “diddy”.