4 ms·
Could we also consider just not connecting critical systems to the internet at large? No reason, for example, for the Jaguar assembly line to depend on an inter
by VyseofArcadia 1y ago
Could we also consider just not connecting critical systems to the internet at large? No reason, for example, for the Jaguar assembly line to depend on an internet connection.
- BitsAndObjects 1y agoI suppose we could all do what Asahi have been forced to do and go back to using pens, paper and fax machines: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly64g5y744o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly64g5y744o
- like_any_other 1y agoMalware can hop through airgaps on USB keys, so that's not enough: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet
- wbl 1y agoHow else do you expect to move the information around between sites and use it?
- yvdriess 1y agoYep air-gapped security is a thing. But servicing, patching and communicating with air-gapped devices still needs to happen, which involves connecting to them somehow. Likely a manufacturing plant has started to connect everything together to streamline the process and created an attack surface that way. You can see the appeal for not needing to go through all the issues, complexity and costs that entails.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]