3 ms·

the second item is exa modern replacement for ls/tree, not maintained "not maintained" doesn't smell "modern" to me...

• arccy 1y ago
  like good open source, it's now forked by a community instead of having only a single maintainer eza: https://github.com/eza-community/eza https://github.com/eza-community/eza
  • abenga 1y ago
    The README has an ad at the top. Yeeeah, nope.
    • CaptainOfCoit 1y ago
      For a cloud-based terminal emulator that heavily focuses on AI none the less. And they have the stomach to call it "for developers".
    • selectnull 1y ago
      The tool itself has no ads. What's wrong with a README having an ad?
      • _ZeD_ 1y ago
        everything.
        • selectnull 1y ago
          So much talk about paying open source developers and when someone actually does something about it and try to make some money, it's again not good enough. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
        • esafak 1y ago
          Why don't you sponsor the project so they can take it down?
• Hendrikto 1y ago
  Literally the next line lists its replacement eza.
• throw_a_grenade 1y ago
  On the contrary, that's exactly what “modern” sounds like. I wonder when all those tools will go unmaintained. Coreutils, with all their problems, are maintained since before authors of many listed tools were born.
• JohnKemeny 1y ago
  That's the Lindy effect: old tools like ls last because they've already lasted, while modern ones often don’t stick around long enough to. the future life expectancy is proportional to its current age https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect