4 ms·
But she also claims he "was innocent and falsely accused": https://www.colinmcginn.net/john-searle/ https://www.colinmcginn.net/john-searle/
by sgustard 1y ago
But she also claims he "was innocent and falsely accused": https://www.colinmcginn.net/john-searle/ https://www.colinmcginn.net/john-searle/
- jrflowers 1y agoShe could feel that the 2016 allegations specifically were unfounded while acknowledging the previous pattern of misconduct. https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2017/04/10/earlier-complaints-professor-accused-harassment https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2017/04/10/earlier...
- pryce 1y agoThis is a curious case of one accused academic writing to a second accused academic about the status of a third accused academic, being published widely by the second of the three accused academics in a post explicitly concerned with allegations of (sexual) misconduct against academics in general. I'm very certain that issues of justice are complicated, and that allegations of misconduct are not always correct and that allegations in and of themselves must not be immediately treated as substantiated; yet surely, if it is justice we are interested in, we must be careful to ensure our fact-seeking methods do not not unduly rely on testimonies of those accused to the detriment of all other lines of inquiry. I understand in McGinn's case that actual documents of the harassment are available, and I think that if some academics believe they need to push back against allegations of sexual harrassment they consider wrongful, a person with documented harassment is profoundly inappropriate to be spearheading that.