2 ms·
>This is something your insurance should be required to cover or should be part of a standard homeowners insurance package, and the insurance company can sue th
by yupyupyups 1y ago
>This is something your insurance should be required to cover or should be part of a standard homeowners insurance package, and the insurance company can sue the government and try to get those questions answered from the city.
Then the city would have to charge the taxpayer. It's more fair to just revoke police personal immunity and have the incurence company sue the individual police officers involved. This way the police will be incentivized to not wreck people's homes, no?
- hahahacorn 1y agoWhile that may or may not be my belief as well, it’s a broader question than this specific article is addressing. An individual citizen should not be bringing these complex issues to court for a $16k payout. Obviously their insurance companies should be covering victim compensation and then suing the city.
- LorenPechtel 1y agoThe insurance companies specifically do not cover government actions. It makes perfectly good sense when the police are right, but when an innocent gets caught up in it compensation should be due.