4 ms·
Why would you even need dedicated hardware for just 40 Gb/s? That is within single-core decryption performance which should be the bottleneck for any halfway de
by Veserv 1y ago
Why would you even need dedicated hardware for just 40 Gb/s? That is within single-core decryption performance which should be the bottleneck for any halfway decent transport protocol. Are we talking 40 Gb/s at minimum packet size so you need to handle ~120 M packets/s?
- wildzzz 1y agoBecause the entire stack is auditable here. There's no Cisco backdoor, no Intel ME, no hidden malware from a zombie NPM package. It's all your hardware.
- ponkpanda 1y agoExcept FPGA chips/boards aren't free from malware either: https://www.iacr.org/archive/ches2012/74280019/74280019.pdf https://www.iacr.org/archive/ches2012/74280019/74280019.pdf Nor will you be immune from AMD Vitis/Vivado sideloading crap into the bitstream. Sadly, you have to fab your own chips using sovereign facilities if you want security. Individuals simply cannot access genuinely high assurance product and there's no major government in the world with the slightest interest in changing their stance on this policy. There are simply too many governments long on SIGINT to go down such a route.