4 ms·

The author of the article is comparing past and present. It's not irrelevant to the article.

• bc569a80a344f9c 1y ago
  The whole point of the article is that the dotcom era produced long term assets that stayed valuable for decades after the bubble burst, and argues that the AI era is producing short term assets that won’t be of much use if the bubble bursts.
  • cactusplant7374 1y ago
    But the chips of the dotcom era were not long-term assets. The author appears to claim that.
    • bc569a80a344f9c 1y ago
      Where? I scanned the article again. I can’t seem to find that.