24 ms·
The original article was discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45544044 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45544044
by slowmovintarget 1y ago
The original article was discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45544044 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45544044
- lapcat 1y ago1 day ago, 511 comments This current submission is nothing but a duplicate and should be flagged dead.
- behnamoh 1y ago[flagged]
- leakycap 1y agoSeconded. I don't need a recipe-blog-length analysis to gain value from what the author has to say and appreciated the additional comments this article has spurred on.
- lapcat 1y agoHere's a comment from the author, who is surprised that it's at the top of HN and calls it "a dashed-off blog post about a real blog post": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45561201 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45561201 This submission has now been flagged, so I'm clearly not alone here.
- leakycap 1y agoNo one said you're alone. But yay, now a discussion has been closed because a three people complained.
- lapcat 1y ago> now a discussion has been closed because a three people complained Incorrect. Discussion continues on the original submission: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45544044 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45544044 It makes no sense to have two simultaneous discussions on HN of the exact same article.
- leakycap 1y agoAttention! All discussion has been moved to a new thread. Why are you still commenting here? Don't you understand it doesn't make sense to continue talking here if there's already conversation elsewhere? Goodness, whatever you do please don't reply or you'll just continue the problem!