That's not what's being argued here. Wikipedia has exactly the information you've described (as it should!). There's no real argument over whether Wikipedia sho

That's not what's being argued here. Wikipedia has exactly the information you've described (as it should!). There's no real argument over whether Wikipedia should or should not have information about flat earth ideology. What's being discussed is whether Wikipedia should call it incorrect or not. Or rather, whether the idea that the earth is round is the truth. You can still provide information about provably false ideas while pointing to another idea grounded in facts as the truth.