2 ms·
Sample size of 59 also seems worse than useless; I'm no researcher so maybe there's something I'm missing here but, doesn't seem very good. Junk science?
by mouse_ 1y ago
Sample size of 59 also seems worse than useless; I'm no researcher so maybe there's something I'm missing here but, doesn't seem very good.
Junk science?
- mapontosevenths 1y agoIt's just an early study, not junk. The primary conclusion of this research was basically just "this looks like it would be worth doing more research on." Which is a fair conclusion for a study this small.