3 ms·

> Recently the quality is degrading so much You can say it sucked and still continue to suck, but that LLM/agentic AI is degrading is simply false. Such a stat

by nsonha 1y ago

> Recently the quality is degrading so much You can say it sucked and still continue to suck, but that LLM/agentic AI is degrading is simply false. Such a statement really makes me question the genuinity of the rest of the comment.

hansmayer 1y ago
Well, unlike mine, "simply false" as we know, is the ultimate argument to prove one's point, isn´t it?
- nsonha 1y ago
  > unlike mine "unlike"? You made a claim and has nothing to show for either. Only difference is that the claim is actually way more ridiculous. Somehow technology advanced backward and you're the only one noticed.
  - hansmayer 1y ago
    Keep punching those "arguments" sport :)
    - nsonha 1y ago
      Claiming AI regresses is like claiming that computer chips are getting slower. It's way less believable than you sucking at the basic skills of using AI (keep context poisoning I'd imagine) and get to the point that YOUR AI set up degrades. Instead of learning how to do things properly you just keep expecting magic and blaming technology for, again, somehow, going backward.
      - hansmayer 1y ago
        > Claiming AI regresses is like claiming that computer chips are getting slower Yeah, or maybe learn how transformer architecture with neural networks actually works and stop comparing apples to oranges. > that YOUR AI set up degrades Well, yeah, I did nothing but say all the time that the so-called "AI" has been degrading in my own setup, my entire company to be precise. Who knows, maybe myself and my team are just stupid and we "suck" at writing english-language sentences. Have a stroll through subreddits dedicated to cursor, claude, chatgpt. You could be onto something. So many stupid people vs. a few of those like you, who are apparently very smart. The masters of "Prompt Engineering". Or could it be, that your use-case is so trivial, and you so inexperienced, that whatever the statistical parrot spits out, seems like wonder to you?

by nsonha 1y ago

hansmayer 1y ago

Well, unlike mine, "simply false" as we know, is the ultimate argument to prove one's point, isn´t it?

nsonha 1y ago
> unlike mine "unlike"? You made a claim and has nothing to show for either. Only difference is that the claim is actually way more ridiculous. Somehow technology advanced backward and you're the only one noticed.
- hansmayer 1y ago
  Keep punching those "arguments" sport :)
  - nsonha 1y ago
    Claiming AI regresses is like claiming that computer chips are getting slower. It's way less believable than you sucking at the basic skills of using AI (keep context poisoning I'd imagine) and get to the point that YOUR AI set up degrades. Instead of learning how to do things properly you just keep expecting magic and blaming technology for, again, somehow, going backward.
    - hansmayer 1y ago
      > Claiming AI regresses is like claiming that computer chips are getting slower Yeah, or maybe learn how transformer architecture with neural networks actually works and stop comparing apples to oranges. > that YOUR AI set up degrades Well, yeah, I did nothing but say all the time that the so-called "AI" has been degrading in my own setup, my entire company to be precise. Who knows, maybe myself and my team are just stupid and we "suck" at writing english-language sentences. Have a stroll through subreddits dedicated to cursor, claude, chatgpt. You could be onto something. So many stupid people vs. a few of those like you, who are apparently very smart. The masters of "Prompt Engineering". Or could it be, that your use-case is so trivial, and you so inexperienced, that whatever the statistical parrot spits out, seems like wonder to you?