4 ms·
The samples from the authors' GitHub are just some text vomited onto slides, and the AI voice reading them point by point. Exactly the opposite of a good presen
by fsh 1y ago
The samples from the authors' GitHub are just some text vomited onto slides, and the AI voice reading them point by point. Exactly the opposite of a good presentation.
- mattjenner 1y agoThis might likely develop faster than your typical researcher's presentation skills. It could also increase access more generally. Science communication is a skill, plus an interested reader's ability to get to a conference (or watch the recordings) is limited. If this expands access to science, I'm for it. (and I generally think AI-produced content is slop).
- davidsainez 1y agoIMO this seems like exactly the use cases where AI fails consistently: engaging storytelling and finding the simplest solution to a problem. For example, LLMs are really good at generating walls of code that will run but don't really have good taste in architecting a solution. When I use them for coding I will spend time thinking of a good high-level approach and then use LLMs to fill in the more boilerplate style code