3 ms·

> Media reporters on both sides ( even ones on the ground there ) would not be aware of technology capabilities used to track opposing fighters. What do you me

> Media reporters on both sides ( even ones on the ground there ) would not be aware of technology capabilities used to track opposing fighters. What do you mean by this? Embedded press communicates directly to both sides when and where they are located. These atrocities don't go unnoticed, and many people are in agreement that civilian safety is paramount. The IDF has deliberately neglected their duty to protect civilian populations in obvious, disproportionate and politically-motivated reparations. Israel will not release their illegal hostages or cede their illegally annexed land. They will not offer up their war criminals for trial, nor guarantee safety to non-state media. The IDF's obstinate denial of fair accounting in the war has unintentionally obstructed Hamas from being held accountable on the global stage (something the world desperately wants, considering the state of Yemen). Now Israel needs to choose between international credibility or enacting unlimited vengeance. I think Netanyahu's opposition Ben Gvir puts it well, despite our differences - if Israel cannot decide what it wants, perhaps it's better to tear down the government and start anew.

ThomasPw 1y ago
[flagged]
- koutetsu 1y ago
  There are so many things that are wrong with this sentence. It's such a low effort reply that doesn't offer any proof or arguments to back it up. It isn't true and it's actually documented that it's the IDF that used palestinians as human shields to protect themselves. (https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-army-human-shields-80f358dd2c87a1123f26ffada159701c https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-arm...) Even if were true, this doesn't justify the killing of civilians. You wouldn't blow up an entire building if there was a single terrorist in there. But, if I'm not mistaken, the IDF has quite a high number of acceptable collateral casualties, in the 100s, for a single valid target. So they're purposefully attacking civilians or attacking without any care for them.
  - ThomasPw 1y ago
    [flagged]
    - koutetsu 1y ago
      Yet another claim without anything to back it up. I at least try to provide a relevant link when I state something. Which booby traps are you talking about? If they do exist, do you have any proof that they have killed civilians in Gaza? What is this question about the number of terrorists and the targeting of buildings? It's well documented that the IDF lies about their targets, like the time they killed medics, burried them and their vehicle and claimed theywere approaching dangerously, but then when video proof showed they were lying they said it was a mistake. Relevant links: - https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/5/unprecedented-video-shows-last-moments-of-gaza-medics-killed-by-israel https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/5/unprecedented-video-... - https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/ https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/
      - ThomasPw 1y ago
        [flagged]
      - ThomasPw 1y ago
        RE '...time they killed the medics ...." Id observe ...Lots mistakes made in war / fighting. Also Consider friendly fire killing their own solders situations. Google of the phrase "...lots mistakes are made n war..." gives numerous mistakes made in past warfare.
  - ThomasPw 1y ago
    [dead]
ThomasPw 1y ago
RE "..... would not be aware of technology capabilities used to track opposing fighters...." There would be techniques used to determine location of Hamas fighters , therefore making that location a military target.
- bigyabai 1y ago
  Techniques like the Dahiya doctrine, which identify civilian infrastructure to destroy to punish Gazan civilians? Or techniques like the Hannibal directive, where the IDF arbitrarily calls their own soldiers Hamas fighters so they can kill them with impunity too? You really have to be more specific. Israel has a lot of techniques used to justify killing known non-combatants, civilians or even engaging in fratricide.
  - tguvot 1y ago
    Dahiya doctrine, as you described it, is a myth that has no confirmation for existence. Hannibal directive the way you describe it, doesn't exist as well. Even looking at wiki page will confirm it: "it is clearly stated that, in case of an attempted abduction, soldiers should fire at the abductors "while avoiding hitting the captive"
ThomasPw 1y ago
RE :... nor guarantee safety to non-state media....." Local Gaza people acting as media would need to be partially careful. Such people would have their location tracked , their associates tracked ......

ThomasPw 1y ago

[flagged]

koutetsu 1y ago
There are so many things that are wrong with this sentence. It's such a low effort reply that doesn't offer any proof or arguments to back it up. It isn't true and it's actually documented that it's the IDF that used palestinians as human shields to protect themselves. (https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-army-human-shields-80f358dd2c87a1123f26ffada159701c https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-arm...) Even if were true, this doesn't justify the killing of civilians. You wouldn't blow up an entire building if there was a single terrorist in there. But, if I'm not mistaken, the IDF has quite a high number of acceptable collateral casualties, in the 100s, for a single valid target. So they're purposefully attacking civilians or attacking without any care for them.
- ThomasPw 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - koutetsu 1y ago
    Yet another claim without anything to back it up. I at least try to provide a relevant link when I state something. Which booby traps are you talking about? If they do exist, do you have any proof that they have killed civilians in Gaza? What is this question about the number of terrorists and the targeting of buildings? It's well documented that the IDF lies about their targets, like the time they killed medics, burried them and their vehicle and claimed theywere approaching dangerously, but then when video proof showed they were lying they said it was a mistake. Relevant links: - https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/5/unprecedented-video-shows-last-moments-of-gaza-medics-killed-by-israel https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/5/unprecedented-video-... - https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/ https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/
    - ThomasPw 1y ago
      [flagged]
    - ThomasPw 1y ago
      RE '...time they killed the medics ...." Id observe ...Lots mistakes made in war / fighting. Also Consider friendly fire killing their own solders situations. Google of the phrase "...lots mistakes are made n war..." gives numerous mistakes made in past warfare.
- ThomasPw 1y ago
  [dead]

ThomasPw 1y ago

RE "..... would not be aware of technology capabilities used to track opposing fighters...." There would be techniques used to determine location of Hamas fighters , therefore making that location a military target.

bigyabai 1y ago
Techniques like the Dahiya doctrine, which identify civilian infrastructure to destroy to punish Gazan civilians? Or techniques like the Hannibal directive, where the IDF arbitrarily calls their own soldiers Hamas fighters so they can kill them with impunity too? You really have to be more specific. Israel has a lot of techniques used to justify killing known non-combatants, civilians or even engaging in fratricide.
- tguvot 1y ago
  Dahiya doctrine, as you described it, is a myth that has no confirmation for existence. Hannibal directive the way you describe it, doesn't exist as well. Even looking at wiki page will confirm it: "it is clearly stated that, in case of an attempted abduction, soldiers should fire at the abductors "while avoiding hitting the captive"

ThomasPw 1y ago

RE :... nor guarantee safety to non-state media....." Local Gaza people acting as media would need to be partially careful. Such people would have their location tracked , their associates tracked ......