3 ms·
It’s not open core (which is a type of open source), it’s not open source, and it’s not “not pure open source”. It’s not open at all. It’s a nonfree license.
by sneak 1y ago
It’s not open core (which is a type of open source), it’s not open source, and it’s not “not pure open source”.
It’s not open at all. It’s a nonfree license.
It’s neither free as in freedom nor free as in beer.
You’re not “all for free software” if you carry water like this for a proprietary nonfree source-available package such as you are here.