3 ms·
“Based on the information provided,” she wrote, “we were not able to conclude that there was a violation of our policy.” This seems to be a favourite of these
by andy99 1y ago
“Based on the information provided,” she wrote, “we were not able to conclude that there was a violation of our policy.”
This seems to be a favourite of these companies. While orders of magnitude less bad, I’ve reported several deepfake crypto scams on LinkedIn where there is an ad for a politician deepfaked into announcing some investment scam, on a website made up to look like a popular news outlet. There’s no question it’s a scam, but minutes after reporting you get back a “we didn’t find any violation of our policy” reply.
I suspect that “Liviana” is an AI bot and know for a fact that airbnb couldn’t care less about this. A proper justice system would bankrupt them over this.
Although to be fair, why does anyone think letting a random stranger rent you a room is a good idea. I bet people also think the sheets and towels get washed between stays.
- perching_aix 1y agoIf I may be so bold, inconsistent and/or nonexistent enforcement of service policies and terms should be illegal, along with defining terms and policies the service provider knows or should reasonably suspect they cannot appropriately enforce. I'm thoroughly sick of the template claims and replies with posturings about how much they care, only for these companies to magically never find any issues in slamdunk situations. It's practically industry status quo at this point, like a shadow justice system of the worst kind.
- dangsecondalt 1y ago[dead]