3 ms·
It might be too soon to call it abandoned, but I was very intrigued by the Austral [1] language. The spec [2] is worth reading, it has an unusual clarity of tho
by exp1orer 1y ago
It might be too soon to call it abandoned, but I was very intrigued by the Austral [1] language. The spec [2] is worth reading, it has an unusual clarity of thought and originality, and I was hoping that it would find some traction. Unfortunately it seems that the author is no longer actively working on it.
[1] https://austral-lang.org/ https://austral-lang.org/
[2] https://austral-lang.org/spec/spec.html https://austral-lang.org/spec/spec.html
- khaledh 1y agoSame with Vale: https://vale.dev https://vale.dev
- alexeldeib 1y agoouch, last “recent update” in 2023. Any idea what happened?
- valorzard 1y agoThe author got hired by Modular, the AI startup founded by the creators of LLVM and Swift, and is now working on the new language Mojo. He’s been bringing a bunch of ideas from Vale to Mojo
- alexeldeib 1y agoOh nice! I just had an excuse to try mojo via max inference, it was pretty impressive. Basically on par with vllm for some small benchmarks, bit of variance in ttft and tpot. Very cool!
- ofalkaed 1y agoI played with Austral about a year ago and really wanted to use it for my projects, but as a hobbyist and mostly inept programmer it lacked the community and ecosystem I require. I found it almost intuitive and the spec does an amazing job of explaining the language. Would love to see it get a foothold.