4 ms·

Also not official numbers my brother [1]. Check your sources. [1] https://www.reuters.com/technology/openais-first-half-revenue-rises-16-about-43-billion-infor

• jcranmer 1y ago
  "Reported to shareholders" is a whole heck of a lot more accurate than some person on the internet playing numerology to turn similarly sketchily-sourced user numbers into revenue numbers.
  • 827a 1y ago
    That number was not reported as "reported to shareholders". Again, its astounding how wrong you keep getting this. It was leaked to The Information by an anonymous source who claimed to be a shareholder who received this financial disclosure. Its all about citation. Everyone who read my numerology estimations above knew that they were estimations. You, on the other hand, lied about two different leaks of OpenAI's revenue numbers as being "official".