I don't understand. Weren't we told that these age checks are "privacy-preserving"? So why was there anything for hackers to steal? Or do they mean "privacy-pre

I don't understand. Weren't we told that these age checks are "privacy-preserving"? So why was there anything for hackers to steal? Or do they mean "privacy-preserving" only against other random users of a service, but not against the service itself, the corporation running it, it's subsidiaries and parent conglomerate, their "trusted partners", the process of legal discovery if that corporation ever gets sued, legal subpoena by the police and intelligence agencies of every jurisdiction that conglomerate conducts business in, local councils [1], every government agency you can think of including ambulance service providers [2], and of course data breaches? "Privacy." [1] https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/british-councils-used-ripa-conduct-mass-surveillance-people-over-5-years-report-1598090 https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/british-councils-used-ripa-conduct... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigatory_Powers_Act_2016#Authorities_allowed_to_access_Internet_connection_records https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigatory_Powers_Act_2016#...