To your last question, zero, because no one has children anymore because of the present. The past can be interesting, but is not a direct substation for actual

To your last question, zero, because no one has children anymore because of the present. The past can be interesting, but is not a direct substation for actual discussion in the present. I mean in this one thread supposedly about the impact of capital itself now being able to create labour, instead of paying for labor, something that has never happened in history we have such depth on the topic at hand as: 'In the past everything perfectly just magically worked out so it will magically work out now and magic new jobs will appear because jobs appeared in the past' 'The past was horrific, you should be grateful for any current job and ignore you are getting poorer' 'The past was an special one off time in history, you can't expect that now' 'Medicine didn't exist in the past. Think about the children' Zero depth of discussion but a shit load of handwaving away actual discussion.