3 ms·
as was posted elsewhere, it was an industrial curing accelerant chemical used to make grout cure faster. It was not a cement burn. It's interesting, though, th
by idiotsecant 1y ago
as was posted elsewhere, it was an industrial curing accelerant chemical used to make grout cure faster. It was not a cement burn.
It's interesting, though, that your first impulse is to defend the robber barons that made this happen.
- pas 1y agothey are not defending Elon their guess was pretty good cement or curing agents are hardly the environmental apocalyptic scenario for the beautiful and pristine environment of downtown Vegas, hm?
- guywithahat 1y agoI derived my opinion by reading the article, noticing there was no description of the burn, and then noticing the incredibly small fine and relatively relaxed attitude by regulators. If you'd read my comment again I didn't say it was a cement burn, just that that is an example of a mild burn. The real irony is if it was just a curing accelerant, then it was an incredibly mild burn, and you're still wrong.