3 ms·
That’s about as useful as opening a fortune cookie and reading it off as an answer. Straight from the horse’s mouth: https://web.archive.org/web/20230630013840
by throwup238 1y ago
That’s about as useful as opening a fortune cookie and reading it off as an answer.
Straight from the horse’s mouth: https://web.archive.org/web/20230630013840/http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr_4_08/article_05_3.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230630013840/http://www.boeing...
In the first table they list 2307-2374 kg of fuel for takeoff and climb.
- whycome 1y agoYou’re talking to the wrong horse though. Isn’t a 737-8 the max 8 variant? It uses newer dual CFM LEAP-1B engines. How does it compare? I can’t really find the data. The spec you’re referring to is for the older 737-800. Another fortune cookie: https://www.aircraft-commerce.com/wp-content/uploads/aircraft-commerce-docs/General%20Articles/2021/137_FLTOPS.pdf https://www.aircraft-commerce.com/wp-content/uploads/aircraf... It suggests an overall savings of ~14% over the 737-800 but doesn’t look at specific takeoff/climb comparison. I wasn’t posting the LLM output as a source of truth. I was just using it to question the uncited value. And I still really don’t know the answer. If you’ve got another data source I’d love to get it.