4 ms·
Yeah, this looks pretty neglected by Google. Interesting comparison. I couldn't help noticing that the GMaps link loads instantly while this (much more useful)
by graue 14y ago
Yeah, this looks pretty neglected by Google. Interesting comparison. I couldn't help noticing that the GMaps link loads instantly while this (much more useful) OSM link took nearly 20 seconds to fully load.
- nine_k 14y agoTry reloading. I think g.maps code was already in your browser's cache, while OSM's was not.
- rmc 14y agoPartially that's the obvious due to Google having, like a bajillion servers, and OSM having like 2 dozen. However the advantage of OSM is that it's the data, and you can render your own maps on your own hardware, and depending on your budget, make it as fast as possible.