3 ms·
It gets worse. I payed the one off 299$ for a pro license but have yet to find a reason to use any of the pro features. I was hoping to need them for the goo
by andersmurphy 1y ago
It gets worse.
I payed the one off 299$ for a pro license but have yet to find a reason to use any of the pro features.
I was hoping to need them for the google sheets clone [1] I was building but I seem to be able to do it without PRO features.
- [1] https://cells.andersmurphy.com/ https://cells.andersmurphy.com/
- sgt 1y agoArguably that's good though - for the project. It means it's not a bait and switch like many have claimed. You can build pretty much anything with regular Datastar.
- Tepix 1y agoI don't understand. Why is it a problem with Datastar if you buy their Pro license without needing it?
- aquariusDue 1y agoThe comment is tongue in cheek. On the discord it was discussed at length and some of the plugins in the Pro version were actually considered anti-patterns, it actually is kinda easy to complicate things needlessly when getting used to D* and I know I did this too in the beginning. As was said by the commenter in another reply, the inspector is actually the bit that makes the Pro version much more appealing but most people wouldn't know from the sidelines.
- nchmy 1y agoI, also, was swindled by those cultists. I thought the devs' emphatic assertions in their Discord NOT to buy Datastar Pro was a psyop dark pattern. I bought it to spite them, and barely use any of it. I want my css-in-js back!
- sudodevnull 1y agohe is out of line but he is right
- infecto 1y agoCould not tell if sarcasm or not. This seems awesome to me. You are using a piece of software and supporting it.
- andersmurphy 1y agoSorry, yes it was sarcasm (I should have indicated that explicitly). I'm happy to fund a tool that I really enjoy using, even if I don't use any of the PRO features.