4 ms·

What design do you think would be better?

• troupo 1y ago
  Both Datastar and HTMX have the same issue: they want to pretend to be HTML. So they force themselves into writing several DSLs like this to pretend that this is still "just HTML". Since they have a full "Datastar expression" language, I'd just expand that. Then you wouldn't need these weird constructs: <button data-on-click__window__debounce.500ms.leading="$foo = ''"></button>
  • jmstevers 1y ago
    Well they are both "just HTML", Datastar being better about being spec compliant using the dataset attributes and all. By expanding the "Datastar expression" language, do you mean a compiled language or moving all the expressions into JS files or something else?
    • troupo 1y ago
      > By expanding the "Datastar expression" language, do you mean a compiled language or moving all the expressions into JS files or something else? Doesn't matter. They literally already have a Javascript-like DSL: https://data-star.dev/guide/datastar_expressions https://data-star.dev/guide/datastar_expressions
  • sudodevnull 1y ago
    Datastar is spec compliant HTML. Please point me to the code that's not HTML spec compliant