4 ms·
> ... Who is to blame here? That is not really relevant, is it? The LLM is not a human. The question is whether it is still af efficient to use LLMs after spe
by tossandthrow 1y ago
> ... Who is to blame here?
That is not really relevant, is it? The LLM is not a human.
The question is whether it is still af efficient to use LLMs after spending huge amounts of time giving the context - or if it is just as efficient to write the code yourself.
> I still remember training a junior hire who started off with
Working with LLMs is not training junior developers - treating it as such is yet another resource sink.
- NumberCruncher 1y agoI think we have to agree that we disagree. What works for you doesn't have to work for me and vice-versa.
- tossandthrow 1y agoIf you want to sit and throw tokens after thinking you are treating an LLM like a junior developer, all power to you. Meanwhile, I think I will stick to get tangible performance benefits out if its usage.